The Sydney Morning Herald logo
Advertisement

This was published 3 months ago

Epstein files release as it happened: Celebrities, politicians feature in photos, Congress told of 1200 victims as US Justice Department makes public Jeffrey Epstein files

Michael Koziol
Updated ,first published
Pinned post from 6.24pm on Dec 20, 2025
Go to latest

And that’s a wrap on a dramatic day in the US

By Michael Koziol

And that concludes our live coverage of today’s publication of the Epstein files, on a dramatic day that has seen only a limited release of photographs and documents.

Democrats and Republicans are now threatening to impeach or prosecute Donald Trump’s Attorney-General, Pam Bondi, over the partial release of the files, which have also been heavily redacted.

Victims of the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein are disappointed, with one saying redactions were obviously made to protect the rich and powerful men who had witnessed or taken part in Epstein’s crimes.

One released document, however, has confirmed that the FBI received a complaint about Epstein’s predilection for child pornography nearly a decade before he was properly investigated for child sex offences.

You can read more about the day’s events here.

Pinned post from 12.14pm on Dec 20, 2025
Go to latest

Fill the blanks: What these files really say about the Epstein saga

By Michael Koziol

The story of today is really what is not in the files released by the US Department of Justice, rather than what is in them.

We haven’t got grand jury evidence and transcripts, we haven’t got internal FBI memos, we haven’t got names of alleged co-conspirators – something the politicians pushing for the release of these documents were expecting (or wanting) to see.

Or perhaps we have, and we just can’t see them. The level of redaction in these files is huge. I’ve just seen a 100-page document that is entirely blacked out – you can’t even tell what the document was supposed to contain.

A 100-page document in the release, which has been entirely redacted.US Justice Department

It’s far from the only one. Democratic congressman Ro Khanna, who led the push for the files’ release, said there was a 119-page document of New York grand jury testimony that was completely redacted. This release “fails to comply with the law”, Khanna said.

His Republican colleague Thomas Massie, who also led the push for transparency, agreed the document dump “fails to comply with both the spirit and of the law” that President Donald Trump signed 30 days ago.

Deputy attorney-general Todd Blanche has said there will be more documents released over the coming two weeks, so we await those to (hopefully) learn more.

Ro Khanna, left, and Thomas Massie pushed for more transparency on the Epstein files last month.AP
Pages from a totally redacted New York grand jury file into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.AP
Pinned post from 8.26am on Dec 20, 2025
Go to latest

US Justice Department releases Epstein files

By Michael Koziol

The US Department of Justice has begun releasing hundreds of thousands of documents related to its investigation of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

It has created an “Epstein Library” consisting of the new disclosures under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, as well as all the previously released material related to Epstein.

You can access the vault here: https://www.justice.gov/epstein

There are (so far) four large zip files.

Pinned post from 7.06am on Dec 20, 2025
Go to latest

What are the Epstein files? And what might be revealed?

By Michael Koziol

The long-running furore over the so-called Epstein files is expected to reach new heights after a judge ruled that a tranche of documents previously kept secret be unsealed. The documents are expected to offer more insights into the federal investigations into deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirator and occasional lover, Ghislaine Maxwell. Epstein died in jail before he could be tried. Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year jail term for child sex trafficking.

Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in an undated photo released by the US District Attorney’s Office.US District Attorney’s Office

US President Donald Trump has been in an awkward position over the Epstein files for the better part of his second term in the presidency. He has called the files boring, a hoax and “something nobody cares about” and denied he had contributed to the so-called “Birthday Book” presented to Epstein on his 50th birthday. Ultimately, though, both Democrats and Republicans have agreed that many of the files should be unsealed.

“The questions on everyone’s minds, I think, are whether high-powered men took part in the abuse or helped to cover it up,” Holly Baltz, investigative editor at The Palm Beach Post, one of the Florida newspapers responsible for surfacing many of the Epstein revelations alongside the Miami Herald, told us in August. “They also want to know whether the government buried information in order to protect them.”

Here is what might be revealed.

Latest Posts

Today’s release means Epstein saga will continue to dog Trump

By Catherine Naylor

If the Epstein files released today were supposed to be a bombshell, it was a bomb that failed to detonate – at least, not in the expected way, our North America correspondent Michael Koziol writes in his analysis of today’s events.

It was only in the hours before the deadline that the Trump administration admitted it was not going to release all the Epstein files on Saturday (AEDT), the legal deadline.

Deputy attorney-general Todd Blanche went on Fox News to say that while “several hundred thousand” files would be made public, there would be several hundred thousand more released over the next two weeks – the Christmas and New Year’s break.

Pretty convenient timing. But the limited amount of information released today means the Epstein saga will continue to dog Trump. Rightly or wrongly, the notion that something is being covered up here will persist.

You can read more here.

Naked images of women accidentally released

By Catherine Naylor

Video footage included in the latest release of the Epstein files shows the faces of young women, some of who are naked, the UK Telegraph reports.

The faces and bodies of the vast majority of females featured in photographs and footage released today have been redacted, with the US Justice Department citing privacy reasons, but some images do not appear to have been blurred, the paper reports.

These include young women featured in a video filmed by a justice official walking through one of Epstein’s homes. The women were in photographs hung on the walls of the house, or displayed in other areas of the property, and included some that were naked or topless.

A framed photograph of Epstein with a female on his lap, documented during a search of his home on Little Saint James island in 2019.AP

Thousands of photos, but far fewer files than expected

By

The law signed by US Donald Trump last month ordering the release of the Epstein files set Friday (today AEDT) as the deadline for the Justice Department to release most of its files.

Ahead of the release, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told Fox News he expected several hundred thousand files to be released today, along with several hundred thousand more to come later.

But the number of files that actually landed on the Justice Department’s website at 8am today (AEDT) seemed to be a thin slice of the total number expected. Blanche acknowledged in a letter to Congress that the production of files was incomplete. The department said it expected to complete its production of Epstein documents by the end of the year.

Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in one of the photos released today.US Justice Department
Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in one of the photographs released today.US Justice Department
Advertisement

US government accepts possible ‘over-redaction’ of files

By Paul Dyer

The Justice Department has acknowledged its cautious approach to protecting Epstein victims could be seen as an “over-redaction” of the files.

US attorney for the Southern District of New York Jay Clayton told a federal court today that the department had chosen to “err on the side of redacting to protecting victims”.

“Victim privacy interests counsel in favour of redacting the faces of women in photographs with Epstein even where not all the women are known to be victims because it is not practicable for the Department to identify every person,” Clayton wrote in the filing.

Pages from a totally redacted New York grand jury file into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.AP

“This approach to photographs could be viewed by some as an over-redaction, but the Department believes it should, in the compressed time frame, err on the side of redacting to protecting victims.

“Any review and redaction process of this size and scope is vulnerable to machine error, instances of human error in review, insufficient information about a victim to apply redactions, and the possibility that the media or others in the public will piece together information that in isolation does not identify a victim but can be pieced together to identify a victim.”

Girl asked to show ID to to prove she was ‘under 18’

By Paul Dyer

Jeffrey Epstein asked to see a girl’s identification to make sure she was young enough, an unnamed witness told investigators, according to the newly released files.

A 52-page document from May 2019 included handwritten notes by an investigator – possibly from the FBI and based in New York – taken from an interview with the witness. The notes suggest that “JE” had paid someone and “told her (to) keep looking for girls”.

It was a “desperate time” and they were “running out of girls”, the notes say.

A framed photograph of Epstein with a female on his lap, documented during a search of his home on Little St James island in 2019.AP

The witness also told investigators that Epstein was concerned that some of the girls being brought around were too old and insisted on “young” girls.

Teenage girl’s encounter with Epstein included in files

By Ellen Connolly

WARNING: Graphic content

A newly surfaced interview from 2006, contained within the Epstein files, details the account of a 14-year-old girl who described an encounter with Jeffrey Epstein in blunt, childlike language.

The girl told police that she met Epstein, who was introduced as “Jeff” at his Palm Beach House. His assistant directed her to give “Jeff”, who was aged 45 at the time, a massage.

A newly released photograph of Jeffrey Epstein.AP

She told police that Epstein did not change his clothes in front of her but as he removed his towel before the massage, he exposed himself.

She recalled that Epstein was “very hairy, particularly on his chest”, and said his hairline extended down to his buttocks.

“She thought Epstein was on steroids because he was a really built guy and his wee wee was very tiny,” the document said, referring to his penis.

Advertisement

‘This isn’t about Bill Clinton’, spokesman says

By Ellen Connolly

Bill Clinton’s spokesman has issued a statement following the latest release of Epstein files, in which the former president is featured in a number of photos.

Angel Ureña defended Clinton and accused sitting US President Donald Trump of associating with a known sex offender.

“The White House hasn’t been hiding these files for months only to dump them late on a Friday to protect Bill Clinton. This is about shielding themselves from what comes next, or from what they’ll try and hide forever,” Ureña said in a post on social media platform X.

Clinton in a hot tub with an unidentified woman.US Department of Justice

“So they can release as many grainy 20-plus-year-old photos as they want, but this isn’t about Bill Clinton. Never has, never will be. Even [chief of staff] Susie Wiles said Donald Trump was wrong about Bill Clinton.”

Urena said the Epstein saga had always involved two groups of people – those who associated with the disgraced financier before he was convicted of sex offences, and those who continued to associate with him afterwards, and Clinton had always been in the first group.

The Department of Justice said that not all of the documents have yet been released, and additional material is expected to be unsealed in the coming weeks.

Release vindicates artist who made complaint to FBI in 1996

By Michael Koziol

One of the significant documents in the trove of files released today is an FBI log of a complaint made way back in 1996 by an artist, Maria Farmer, who used to work for Jeffrey Epstein.

Farmer has long said that she told the FBI she believed Epstein stole nude photographs she had taken of her younger sisters, aged 16 and 12, for artistic purposes – but that nothing was done at the time.

The FBI had never publicly acknowledged the complaint, which came nearly a decade before the investigation that would eventually lead to Epstein pleading guilty to child sex offences.

The FBI log of a complaint made by Maria Farmer.US Justice Department

The 1996 handwritten log shows Farmer (the name is redacted) did make the complaint.

Photos give insight into life Epstein led with rich and famous

By Catherine Naylor

Other photos released today feature Epstein with a host of well-known faces. Here are some of them.

An undated photo of Jeffrey Epstein with Sir Richard Branson.PA
Jeffrey Epstein with Michael Jackson.AP
Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton.AP
Michael Jackon, Bill Clinton and Diana Ross, with an unknown personUS Justice Department
Bill Clinton, Mick Jagger and Jeffrey Epstein.US Justice Department
Advertisement