Trump retreats on Greenland threats as ‘framework for a future deal’ discussed

Brussels: US President Donald Trump has dramatically dropped his threat to impose sweeping tariffs on eight nations from February 1 because they oppose his plan to take control of Greenland, saying he now has a “framework for a future deal” on Arctic security.

The sudden move came hours after he ruled out using military force to seize the Arctic territory amid a growing clash over sovereignty and the NATO alliance with leaders from the United Kingdom, France, Germany and other countries.

Trump announced the shift on the tariff threat after a meeting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte at the World Economic Forum in the Swiss town of Davos, after the US president delivered a 70-minute address outlining his demand for Greenland.

“We have formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and, in fact, the entire Arctic Region,” the president posted on Truth Social.

“This solution, if consummated, will be a great one for the United States of America, and all NATO Nations.

“Based upon this understanding, I will not be imposing the Tariffs that were scheduled to go into effect on February 1st.”

He said there would be “additional discussions” about Greenland and the future US missile defence shield known as the Golden Dome, saying the negotiations would be handled by US Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and presidential envoy Steve Witkoff.

Shortly after his post, Trump told CNBC that the framework would be revealed “down the line” and said the terms could last “forever” but offered no details about what it would mean.

The New York Times reported that a compromise could see Denmark and Greenland accept US sovereignty over small areas of the territory where US bases were required. London’s Telegraph reported that the deal would enable the US to control areas of Greenland with US bases, copying the way Britain has control over its base in Cyprus.

Trump’s decision marked his second move within a day to lower the tension in his stand-off with NATO leaders, although major differences remain and several European leaders were said to be planning a meeting in Brussels to respond to his threats.

Earlier, the US president ruled out using force to seize Greenland after months of leaving the option on the table, adjusting his stance amid fears of a trade war over the dispute.

Trump repeated his demand for ownership of Greenland in a major address in Switzerland on Wednesday (early Thursday, AEDT) and warned that America would “remember” if it did not get the island, but made his first clear statement about not using military force to get his way.

“I don’t have to use force. I don’t want to use force. I won’t use force,” he said during an address to about 1000 delegates in Davos, emphasising his remarks to show that he knew he had clarified a key concern among political and business leaders.

In a long and often rambling speech, the US president complained about the NATO alliance, said he wanted to end the “bloodbath” in Ukraine and took aim at leaders such as French President Emmanuel Macron and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who spoke the previous day about the need to stand up to major powers.

One of Trump’s critics, California Governor Gavin Newsom, called the Davos address “nonsensical” and “bullying” and said Trump’s threat of invading Greenland had always been “fake”.

Trump claimed that only the US could defend Greenland in a future war because of its importance in missile defence. He based his claim to the territory on the role of the US in World War II, when it kept Greenland from falling into enemy hands and chose to return it to Denmark at the end of the conflict – a decision he called stupid.

“We never asked for anything and we never got anything,” he said about the claim to Greenland.

“We probably won’t get anything unless I decide to use excessive strength and force, where we would be, frankly, unstoppable.

“But I won’t do that. OK? Now everyone’s saying: ‘Oh, good’. That’s probably the biggest statement I made, because people thought I would use force.”

The White House had previously mentioned the option of force despite concerns in Europe that this would amount to an American attack on the Kingdom of Denmark, a NATO member and an ally of the US since World War II.

Two weeks ago, amid headlines about the use of force, it said in a statement: “The president and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this important foreign policy goal, and of course, utilising the US military is always an option at the commander-in-chief’s disposal.”

Trump also earlier this week threatened countries that rejected his claim to Greenland with new tariffs of 10 per cent to start on February 1, rising to 25 per cent on June 1. The tariffs would have applied to Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

Macron used his address in Davos on Tuesday to reject a “new imperialism” and called for a strong European trade response to the threat, a stance backed by several leaders who had called Trump’s threat “blackmail” and supported retaliation on trade.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who struck a trade deal with Trump last year to avoid higher tariffs, took a hard line against the US leader in an address to the European Parliament.

“In this increasingly lawless world, Europe needs its own levers of power,” she said. The parliament voted to halt its ratification of the trade deal, given Trump’s new tariff threat.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is not attending Davos and had taken a softer line on whether to retaliate against the US with matching tariffs, but he told the UK parliament on Wednesday that he opposed Trump’s policy on Greenland.

“I will not yield, Britain will not yield, on our principles and values about the future of Greenland and the threats of tariffs,” he said.

Carney, who has backed the Europeans in their rejection of Trump’s demand for Greenland, appeared to anger the US president with his address at Davos on Tuesday, in which he urged middle powers to join forces on trade and other fronts to oppose great powers.

“The middle powers must act together, because if we’re not at the table, we’re on the menu,” Carney said.

Trump remarked on the “tough” speech from Macron – and noted the sunglasses he was wearing due to an eye condition – but was sharply critical of Carney and hinted at retaliation against Canada.

The US president said his plan for a new missile defence system, called the Golden Dome, would defend Canada as well as America.

“Canada gets a lot of freebies from us, by the way,” he said. “They should be grateful also, but they’re not. I watched your prime minister yesterday, he wasn’t so grateful. But they should be grateful to US. Canada lives because of the United States.”

He also said Denmark was being ungrateful by refusing to hand over Greenland when the US had defended the territory during World War II.

“What I’m asking for is a piece of ice, cold and poorly located, that can play a vital role in world peace and world protection,” he said about America and its NATO allies.

“It’s a very small ask compared to what we have given them for many, many decades.

“But the problem with NATO is that we’ll be there for them 100 per cent, but I’m not sure that they’ll be there for us.

“So with all of the money we expend, with all of the blood, sweat and tears, I don’t know that they’d be there for us. They’re not there for us on Iceland.”

Trump mentioned Iceland at least four times when he meant Greenland.

The comments repeated a common argument from Trump about the need for NATO allies to do more on defence.

“So they have a choice,” he said of the decision for NATO allies.

“You can say yes, and we will be very appreciative, or you can say no, and we will remember.”

Get a note directly from our foreign correspondents on what’s making headlines around the world. Sign up for our weekly What in the World newsletter.