The Sydney Morning Herald logo
Advertisement

This was published 3 months ago

Abolition of ‘lived experience’ test for mental health leaders alarms industry

Rachel Eddie

A requirement for leaders in mental healthcare to have lived experience has been slashed by the Allan government in what industry figures say is an alarming step backwards.

The restructure of two bodies established as part of the royal commission also triggered concern that some of the Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission’s oversight powers were being dismantled, which the government disputes.

Premier Jacinta Allan and Treasurer Jaclyn Symes release the government response to the Silver review.Wayne Taylor

Self Help Addiction Resource Centre (SHARC) chief executive Clare Davies wrote to Premier Jacinta Allan on Monday to oppose the “alarming” revelation that the commission would lose three of its four commissioners.

The government – as part of its Silver review to find savings in the public service – is also removing one of two chief executives from the Victorian Collaborative Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing.

Advertisement

They have abolished the need for any of the leadership positions to be filled by people who have been affected by mental health challenges.

Davies, in her letter to the premier, said the royal commission was unequivocal that people with lived experience had to be at the centre of reform and that the change would compromise quality.

“Eliminating these roles would dismantle mechanisms designed to uphold accountability
and co-design, directly contradicting the royal commission’s recommendations,” she wrote.

Health and Community Services Union (HACSU) secretary Paul Healey called it a “betrayal” and claimed the system was now worse than before the 2021 Royal Commission into Victoria’s Mental Health System.

“Lived experience voices are being erased, and the system they fought to improve is being pushed backwards. Our members are on the frontlines seeing the damage every day,” Healey said.

Advertisement

Legislation tabled in parliament also clarifies the commission’s monitoring and reporting functions.

Its ability to oversee the quality and safety of the system will be limited to responding to complaints. The commission will also lose its responsibility to oversee outcomes for the community, to instead focus on system outcomes.

The minister will now set the commission’s objectives each year, and it will only be able to access data from health services, though the government rejects any of the proposed changes will limit its oversight powers.

The commission’s most recent annual report, published on Tuesday, tracked progress the government had made but was largely reliant on publicly available data. The Department of Health “very recently” provided additional information, the report said, which the commission said it included “despite having insufficient time to consider the information fully”.

Advertisement

Pru Howell-Jay, chair of the Victorian Mental Illness Awareness Council (VMIAC), said the government’s proposed changes would clearly limit the commission’s capacity to oversee progress.

“This decision reverses the royal commission recommendation. It takes us back to pre-royal commission, which is really disappointing,” Howell-Jay told The Age.

Howell-Jay submitted her own mental health story to the royal commission.

“It took a lot of courage,” she said. “It came with a lot of hope for change, for a better system.

“We were promised that all the recommendations would be implemented … So many people put their heart on the line, reliving their trauma for change. And now we’re feeling like, what was it for?”

Advertisement

Vrinda Edan, chief executive of VMIAC, said there had been “no collaboration, no consultation, no partnering with us and no seeking our view” on the overhaul.

She said the council understood the government’s budget constraints but that there were better ways of finding savings.

VMIAC was questioning whether the government had an ongoing commitment to implementing the royal commission, Edan said. “We haven’t formed a full view yet.”

Tandem Carers acting chief executive Jane Dunne said the advocacy group for carers and support people was deeply concerned.

“We are seeking urgent clarity on how a strong carer perspective will remain embedded in Victoria’s mental health reforms, and whether these changes reflect a shift away from a government commitment to the royal commission’s vision to centre lived experience in system transformation.”

Advertisement

Mental Health Victoria chief executive Phillipa Thomas said it was still unclear whether funding to implement the recommendations was having the intended impact and whether progress against the royal commission was being adequately tracked.

A Victorian government spokesman said the state was leading the nation in mental health reform.

“We’re not wasting a minute building a system that works for every Victorian, no matter where they live,” he said.

“The proposed changes are about strengthening leadership and accountability in the mental health system.

Advertisement

“The commission will remain a critical part of our oversight framework, and these changes will focus the commission on the areas where it can have the greatest impact – safeguarding rights, resolving complaints and helping improve the mental health system.”

Start the day with a summary of the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.

Rachel EddieRachel Eddie is a Victorian state political reporter for The Age. Contact her at rachel.eddie@theage.com.au, rachel.eddie@protonmail.com, or via Signal at @RachelEddie.99Connect via X or email.

From our partners

Advertisement
Advertisement