The Sydney Morning Herald logo
Advertisement

The $31 billion a year threat to the Australian dream: Climate change

Shane Wright

Australia must enter a desalination plant building boom to offset the impact of growing water demand and take urgent action to avoid climate change-related damage to homes that could cost the economy more than $700 billion by the end of the century.

New Productivity Commission research warns state and federal governments to start spending billions of dollars as soon as possible to protect the nation’s housing stock from these threats or face a $31 billion annual damage bill.

Australian houses will face greater threats from climate change that will require changes to planning and construction, the Productivity Commission has warned.Louie Douvis

The commission has used a series of reports to look at policies that would increase the speed at which the economy could grow without adding to inflationary pressures.

In its report on moving to a net zero economy, the commission also conducted modelling into the impact of climate change on the nation’s housing stock.

Advertisement

It found action in the near term such as requiring homes be at least half a metre above ground in flood-prone areas and preventing ember attacks could save taxpayers and residents hundreds of billions of dollars.

The single largest threat the commission found was riverine flooding which, in today’s dollars, it estimated could cost $241 billion in damage by the end of the decade. Surface-water flooding – water overwhelming drainage systems – could cost another $164 billion.

Tropical cyclones ($74 billion), fires ($70 billion) and extreme wind ($100 billion) all pose growing risks to the nation’s homes.

According to the commission, as more homes are built to accommodate the nation’s growing population, the risk to those and existing properties will grow due to the impact of climate change on the natural environment.

Advertisement

“Without targeted action, many existing dwellings will remain exposed to increasing climate risks for decades to come,” it warned.

“Population growth and housing stock turnover are key drivers of future exposure. Continuing to build housing in high-risk areas will increase exposure and asset losses.”

The commission estimates that by the end of the century, the annual damage caused to homes by climate change will be $31 billion or 1 per cent of GDP in today’s dollars. Cumulatively, the cost between 2025 and 2100 will be at least $744 billion.

It argued preventive measures now could drastically reduce that cost. Making homes more resilient to climate change would save $186 billion while preventing the construction of new properties in high-risk areas, such as on floodplains, could save another $54 billion.

It found moving quickly would deliver substantial benefits. A five-year program of work could prevent $38 billion in damages by the end of the century. But dragging it out over 30 years would cost an additional $44 billion in damages.

Advertisement

According to the commission, the federal government should develop a climate resilience star rating system that potential buyers could use to identify homes at risk of climate-related damage.

All levels of government should work together on ways to protect properties including the retrofitting of existing properties and through planning rules.

Floods such as those that hit Lismore in 2022 are expected to hit more often and cause more damage over coming years.Getty Images

“Over the years ahead, boosting our resilience to the impacts of climate change will lower costs to the economy, society and the environment. We need to create the foundations for effective adaptation now,” it found.

“The opportunity to act is greatest when new homes are being planned and built, allowing those benefits to be realised with less disruption and, in many cases, likely at lower cost than retrofitting existing homes,” it found.

Advertisement

It’s not only homes at risk. Oxford Economics Australia believes access to drinking water will be put under greater pressure in coming years.

Economist Dominic McNally said the country is likely to go through a $23 billion desalination plant construction boom as a growing population, construction of data centres and climate change put pressure on drinking water supplies.

Last week, Melburnians were warned they could face water restrictions for the first time in a decade after Victoria experienced its lowest inflows on record between January and June.

Rainfall in south-west WA including Perth has dropped by 20 per cent since the mid-1970s and reduced stream flow by an average 80 per cent. Perth already has two desalination plants and is in the process of building a third in the city’s north.

Advertisement

Oxford said construction on four desalination plants was under way across the country. That will grow to 11 by the end of the decade.

“A desalination construction boom is imminent as water authorities look to desalination plants as the solution to Australia’s impending water shortages,” he said.

The most expensive is likely to be a $5 billion plant to service South-East Queensland, while expansions to current plants in Sydney ($920 million) and Melbourne ($840 million) were likely to be needed.

Get to the heart of what’s happening with climate change and the environment. Sign up for our fortnightly Environment newsletter.

Shane WrightShane Wright is a senior economics correspondent for The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald.Connect via X or email.

From our partners

Advertisement
Advertisement