“This [request for help] happened some seven weeks earlier [than the murders]. It’s what we knew at the time. We’re all standing here today with the benefit of hindsight.”
Blanch said a family violence incident report was submitted, but that where that report went and what action was taken as a result of it, would form part of an investigation.
“The investigation will determine what we knew at the time and whether those decisions were appropriate,” he said.
“It’s important that we do this thoroughly.“
The Bombara women did not have a violence restraining order on Mark and had not applied for one.
Speaking generally Blanch urged anyone fearing for their safety from a gun owner should apply for a VRO.
“If you are in a violent relationship with a person, a family violence restraining order, immediately will remove firearms from a person,” he said.
Blanch deflected whether police rejection of the Bombaras’ request for a 72-hour restraining order would have discouraged them from applying for a full VRO.
“My job today is not to cause more grief to the family involved. The discussions that were had on that night about a range of things should form part of the investigation,” he said.
“But again, I can only reinforce getting a family violence restraining order would’ve removed guns from any person.”