Hello and welcome to this week’s film review wrap – the big movies landing in cinemas this week.
If you want to stay in touch with all the latest movie news from across the globe, as well as reviews, please be sure to sign up to our newsletter.
Must-see movies, interviews and all the latest from the world of film delivered to your inbox. Sign up for ourScreening Room newsletter.
11.43am on Feb 26, 2026
Slim story with a big heart
By Sandra Hall
Solo Mio ★★★½ (PG), 96 minutes
Solo Mio opens with one of those delirious montages radiating such joy that you know it’s all about to end in tears.
And so it goes. Matt (Kevin James), an art teacher, is at the altar when he realises that Heather (Julie Ann Emery), his bride-to-be, isn’t showing up. Sunk in despair, he’s forced to embark on the couple’s honeymoon package in Rome because he can’t get a refund.
Kevin James in Solo Mio.Rialto
Bald and comfortably overweight, James makes an unlikely romcom hero, but over the years he’s segued from stand-up comedy into a thriving career as a TV sitcom star and he soon has you on his side – especially when two of the couples on the honeymoon package take Matt on as their personal project. Becoming even more depressed by their overbearing enthusiasm, he’d rather suffer in solitude.
Things pick up for him when he starts chatting to Gia (Nicole Grimaudo), who runs the cafe near his hotel. She is such a charmer that Julian (Kim Coates) and Neil (Jonathan Roumie), the most ebullient of his self-appointed guardian angels, can’t believe his luck.
The movie is written and directed by Chuck and Dan Kinnane, two of eight brothers who describe themselves as a filmmaking collective, producing, directing, writing and editing everything they make. James has become a regular collaborator and he co-wrote this screenplay with them.
The film has been a hit at the US box office, profiting from an inventive online campaign featuring video clips with James shown in character as Matt conducting his grade school art class. The clincher came when he again appeared in character in the audience at the Super Bowl.
None of this would have worked if the film were not so likeable. Along with James’ unassuming performance, there is the feelgood appeal of Rome itself, shamelessly augmented by a side trip to Tuscany. We’re taken to the Piazza del Campo for the Palio after being treated to a surprise appearance by Andrea Bocelli, who turns up in the role of Gia’s uncle. The sequence was filmed at Bocelli’s country estate, which is designed and decorated in a style that invites you to move right in and naturally, Bocelli delivers an impromptu performance. Matt then has his own moment of glory by joining him in singing Nessun Dorma.
Kevin James and Nicole Grimaudo in Solo Mio.Rialto
The story is very slight, climaxing in a contrived emotional complication which doesn’t make much sense, but there’s plenty of fun to be had in the double act worked up by the hyperactive Jules and the tin-eared Neil, both of whom are expert in the art of giving unwelcome advice, although they finally come round with a few useful insights about their own marriages.
And the script rights itself in time for a ruefully upbeat ending. It’s rare to find an American movie which approaches mature-age romance as engagingly as this one. It’s sweet-natured with a big heart.
11.43am on Feb 26, 2026
This desert mystery is not horror, but it is shocking
By Jake Wilson
Sirat ★★★★½ (M), 115 minutes
Plenty of films strive for the quality of a nightmare, or a bad trip. Sirat, from the French-Galacian director Oliver Laxe, is one that gets that way, not by being elusive and slippery, but through an oppressive concreteness: nearly everything happens out of doors, under a burning sun. This is just the characters hallucinating, we might think at certain moments: it can’t be real. But apparently it is.
Sirat is shocking, but it’s not a horror film, nor does it fit neatly into any other genre. It has agonising suspense sequences, and a hint of science fiction: we seem to be in the very near future, with the characters awaiting the outbreak of World War Three.
(From left) Sergi López, Joshua Liam Henderson, and Stefania Gadda in Sirat.AP
There are also elements of a musical, though not the conventional kind: the first images show giant black speakers being assembled in preparation for a rave in the Moroccan desert, where the red ridges in the distance might also remind us of a Western like John Ford’s The Searchers.
There is, in fact, a search going on, undertaken by the protagonist Luis, played by the familiar and versatile Spanish actor Sergi Lopez, perhaps best known as the villain in Pan’s Labyrinth. Driving a modest van and accompanied by his young son Estefan (Bruno Núñez Arjona), he’s on the trail of Estefan’s older sister, who disappeared into the desert a few months earlier.
Luis’ charismatic averageness contrasts with the studied exoticism of the ravers, who are mostly younger though not youthful, veterans of the latter-day hippie trail adorned with beads, tattoos and other tribal affectations (some are physically unusual in other ways as well).
Sergi López, left, and Bruno Núñez Arjona in a scene from the film.AP
Still, Luis manages to form an alliance with a group of Spanish-speaking friends who form a surrogate family akin to travelling circus folk, played by non-professional actors who use their own names (or nicknames).
To describe where the story goes from here, even vaguely, would amount to a spoiler – and while the film holds up on a second viewing, much of its initial impact depends on having no idea what will happen down the track.
When I saw it originally at last year’s Melbourne International Film Festival, I emerged shaken up but also a little suspicious. Laxe doesn’t shrink from pushing our emotional buttons, and indeed does so more ruthlessly than most Hollywood filmmakers dare.
The impact of this button-pushing is boosted by the score by the French electronic musician Kangding Ray (otherwise known as David Letellier), which strives to make us feel as if we were attending the rave ourselves. Indeed, on all levels Sirat is designed as a shock to the system, meant to affect the body as much as the mind.
That said, it earns its audacities, and is also in its way a film of ideas. The ominous tone eventually turns downright apocalyptic, though not in the way you might be picturing (there are no aliens).
Where so many modern horror films centre on individual grief, Laxe appears to be dealing with mourning on a larger scale. While there’s room for a range of interpretations, it wouldn’t be unreasonable to view Sirat as partly a film about the fate of the planet, in an era when environmental collapse is not merely on the horizon but visibly taking place.
When loss is irreparable, what can it mean to hold onto hope of any sort? Sirat doesn’t give easy answers, but nor is it purely a howl of despair. One option is to keep on dancing, for as long as that remains possible. Another is to push on relentlessly into the future, even if what that future might look like is impossible to guess.
Advertisement
11.42am on Feb 26, 2026
No sex please, we’re Shakers
By Jake Wilson
The Testament of Ann Lee ★★½ (M), 137 minutes
I don’t think I’ve ever seen a more admiring biopic of a cult leader than The Testament of Ann Lee, an ambitious and intriguing but muddled English-language feature from Norwegian writer-director Mona Fastvold, starring Amanda Seyfried as the 18th-century charismatic preacher known to her followers as “Mother Ann”.
“Cult” may seem a harsh world for the Shakers, an offshoot of the Quakers associated with ecstatic dancing, elegantly austere wooden furniture and an insistence on celibacy that has caused their numbers to gradually diminish (one recent report puts the current number of US adherents at three).
The Testament of Ann Lee stars Amanda Seyfried as the founder of the Shakers religious sect. Searchlight Pictures
But the film is a study in grandiosity, no less than the recent The Brutalist, which was co-written by Fastvold and directed by her husband Brady Corbet, a co-writer here in turn. Following a series of visions induced by a hunger strike, Ann announces herself as the literal second coming of Christ, a claim her followers in working-class Manchester are largely willing to take on board. Soon they’re off to share the good news with the rest of the world, setting sail for New England shortly before the American Revolution.
Clearly, we are not being asked to take Ann’s messianic claims at face value, but it’s less than clear what we are meant to make of her crusade. Her teachings are short on Biblical specifics, which makes sense when we learn she’s illiterate, a secret known only to her husband Abraham (Christopher Abbott).
Mostly, her focus is on the evil of sex, a preoccupation stemming from the early years of her marriage, and from the trauma of giving birth to four children, none of whom survived long. Yet there’s a whole lot of sublimated sexual energy in the Shakers’ ritual dances, as Fastvold underlines by making the film a literal musical, with a sometimes jarringly modern score by avant-garde folkie Daniel Blumberg.
These paradoxes seem tailor-made for satire and tragicomedy, and it’s easy to imagine how they might have been exploited by a director like Yorgos Lanthimos (The Favourite). But The Testament of Ann Lee is an almost humourless film, although Seyfried’s flat Northern tones and faintly baffled stare sometimes recall Diane Morgan as the dim-witted TV presenter Philomena Cunk, a fellow citizen of Cloud Cuckoo Land (there’s an echo of Cunk too in the voiceover narration by Thomasin McKenzie, who co-stars as one of Mother Ann’s acolytes).
Amanda Seyfried is dynamic in The Testament of Ann Lee.AP
Like Cunk, the film’s version of Ann is invincibly stubborn but basically sweet-natured – far from the stock idea of a pinched puritan, and too preoccupied by her mission to allow for any suspicion of being driven by ego. Nor is there much scope for irony in Fastvold’s admiring view of the Shakers’ pacifism and belief in social equality, prefiguring some aspects of the modern American left.
Shot on 35-milimetre film, the film has a wan, drained lyricism, as if cinematographer William Rexer meant to emulate the Shaker insistence on chastity by eschewing bright colours and relying on natural light.
It’s also under-dramatised, even wilfully so: after the unlovely Abraham drops out of the picture, there’s little interest in exploring the power dynamics of the Shaker community or how Ann’s influence affects others for good or ill.
While the musical numbers may be meant to offset the willed austerity, they’re so awkwardly staged and integrated into the narrative it’s hard to guess what previous examples of the genre Fastvold has watched and learned from. True, we do eventually get the standard Busby Berkeley shot, looking down at the circling dancers from directly overhead. But as piously kitsch extravaganzas go, Ann Lee is no Sound of Music.
Heartbreaking portrait of a NSW region battered by floods
By Sandra Hall
FILM Floodland ★★★★ (M), 90 minutes
At the beginning of Jordan Giusti’s documentary Floodland, Eli, a Lismore local, is sounding philosophical.
The river rises “now and again”, he says, and the basement of the riverside house he has owned for three years has flooded, but the water has never reached the floor of his living area and he can cope with that.
Eli at home with his dog Gaia.Sydney Film Festival
Then comes the deluge of February 2022, hitting Lismore’s town centre and engulfing the surrounding houses. Many residents struggle onto their rooftops to perch, waiting for help. And as the water rises, Eli watches it seep through his floorboards, eventually forcing him to find his own spot on the roof.
When it’s over he sounds a little less philosophical but he is still bent on staying for reasons expressed in the film’s opening montage – a dreamily evocative celebration of the river with its waterfalls, its bordering rainforest and its chorus of birdsong.
It’s always been Eli’s home. He loves it and the flood has only strengthened his ties with his neighbours as they embark on the horrendous job of clearing away the mud and debris left in the flood’s wake.
It’s a story which takes you far beyond the headlines and the TV news clips about the Lismore floods. Giusti has been a regular visitor to the Northern Rivers region for years and he’s treating us to an insider’s look at its history and the variety of views its residents hold about its future and their willingness to go on living there.
In Eli’s case, his emotional attachment to the place still outweighs its disadvantages and dangers. His friend Harper is more practical. He, too, wants to stay on, but he’s campaigning for the establishment of a house-raising scheme through which the houses at risk would be hoisted up and transported to higher ground.
He’s put together a thick folder of impressive research detailing almost 200 years of poor planning and flagrant mismanagement going right back to fundamental errors made by the area’s early settlers. Describing the district as wok-shaped, with his and Eli’s houses at the bottom of the bowl while their more affluent neighbours are up on the rim, he reminds us that the town is also in the wrong place. Add the settlers’ energetic bouts of deforestation to the mix and the seeds of a disaster are sown.
It’s a sentiment echoed by Dr Carlie Atkinson, a Bundjalung and Yiman community leader who is a social worker in the area. The Indigenous tribes, she says, based themselves up on the hill, coming down to the river only to fish and forage.
When a second flood arrives a few weeks after the first, even Eli is shaken. During the clean-up he met Jess, who is renting a house on the hill with her six-year-old son, Jensen, and the couple have fallen in love. Now that the waters have again swept through his house, he’s reluctant to chance a return.
The film offers no firm solution to any of this. How could it? Giusti’s devastating analysis shows how the errors of the past have combined with climate change to heartbreaking effect, leaving the people of the Northern Rivers facing life on the frontline.