Ruby Schwartz is the Head of Investigative Podcasts for The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald.
Officials say they’re not keeping track of how many shaken baby syndrome cases there are in Australia, but an unlikely duo is working night and day to find out.
One of the nation’s leading lawyers has joined top scientists to say the controversy over abuse diagnosis shows the need for a rethink on science and the courts.
Jesse’s baby boy was very sick and then, according to him, the child had a seizure. A medical team disagreed and within days he was on the path to a prison cell.
One doctor’s word was all it took for a Melbourne father’s life to turn upside down. But after seven years of suffering, he still describes himself as one of the lucky ones.
David’s four-week-old died in his arms, but a swift diagnosis of child abuse by hospital specialists did not stand up in court.
One sentence posing a theory has turned into a call to arms that, 50 years later, doctors and lawyers still can’t agree on. But children in Australia and beyond are being taken from their parents because of it.
A precedent-setting legal judgment in Australia was based on scientific evidence that was “very weak”, says an international expert who gave evidence.
On the opinion of a few influential child abuse specialists, Australians are being found guilty of serious charges and sent to prison. But are people being locked up for a crime they never committed?
A controversial medical diagnosis is behind the jailing of Australians in cases of shaken baby syndrome. That scenario is changing in jurisdictions overseas.
For decades, “shaken baby” theory has put parents in jail all over the world. But has it been destroying the lives of innocent people?